[President Obama] is taking it straight to his perceived enemy, calling both Fox News and Rush Limbaugh radical and out of the mainstream, making the two crazier than a preacher at a whorehouse with a parishioner working the door. Because that is exactly what they say about him. [Emphasis mine.] Methinks there may be a bad case of “can dish it out but not take it” going around.
Conservative commentators are retaliating by lobbing charges of extreme partisanship at the President. Claiming he totally ignored his campaign promise to be “a uniter, not a divider.” Oh wait, that wasn’t him. That was the other guy. Sorry. You remember the last guy. Now there was someone who reeked of non- partisanship. At least I think that’s what it was.
Look, let me me make something clear: this isn’t a case of worshipping Obama. I don’t worship him, much less any mortal on this lugubrious ball. I’m just applauding Durst’s, and yes, Obama’s too, common-sense. The Bush administration and its apologists were opposed to the point of lunacy against any and all criticism. Now Republicans are upset when a president speaks back to the press? Would it kill them them to simply say, “Of course he says we’re wretched! No surprise there. We say the same thing about him. That’s just good business.” The haters of Obama are so full of loathing for the man I wonder if they’d say it was a Communist/Socialist/Islamofascist/feminist/gay liberation plot if he found a cure for AIDS.
This is why I find the U.S. news commentary for the most part so dull. It takes predictability and stodginess to almost Soviet levels. The right condemns the left. The left condemns the right. For the love of God, can’t you once, just once say something surprising? Do you have to follow the party line like a rabbi adheres to kosher dietary laws? Is it possible that an approach or initiative not within your ideological scope might have some validity? Even if you don’t agree with it, can you perceive at least some charm? And why does everything have to be “right/wrong,” “good/bad”? Could it be that they are instances were neither side has an answer? Where the situation is hopeless?
None of today’s pundits are fit to wear H. L. Mencken’s mantle. They’re not intellectuals; they’re yelping, whining sports fans, fanatically devoted to their teams at the cost of all reason and critical thinking.